A study to assess the effectiveness of tele rehabilitation on knee pain for patient with osteoarthritis at selected community
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tele rehabilitation on knee pain among patient with osteo arthritis. A pre-experimental one group pretest post test design is used to conduct the study. The study was done on 30 samples selected by purposive sampling technique from a selected community. The data was collected through questionnaire (Demographic variables) and WOMAC scale questionnaire. After obtaining the permission from the concerned authorities, the data was collected by conducting pretest by using western Ontario and MC Master university Arthritis index (WOMAC) scale and delivering rehabilitation services to the patient through video assisted demonstration on exercise and booklet on dos and don’ts issued to patients at outpatient department following which phone calls were made to every patients with OA in morning and evening to ensure patient participation in rehabilitative activities at home for 15 days and post test was done by using WOMAC scale. The study findings revealed that there was significant difference in the pain score before and after telerehabilitation. Hence the H1 is accepted which shows the difference in the pretest and post-test level of knee pain among patient with Osteoarthritis after Telerehabilitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".