MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390134781 · doi:10.18280/isi.280609

A Self-Powered IoT Platform with Security Mechanisms for Smart Agriculture

2023· article· en· W4390134781 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad Mohammad, Hamed A. Mahmood, Qutaiba I. Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer securityEmbedded systemComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to escalating global challenges posed by climate change and resource scarcity, an innovative Internet of Things (IoT) framework has been developed which is specifically designed for smart agriculture applications.This work integrates a self-powered system with advanced security mechanisms to manage water resources effectively.System central are sensing node and an (ESP32+WIFI) base station, leveraging NRF24L01 technology for efficient data communication.The architecture of the platform is characterized by its integration of hardware components.which are facilitates seamless data collection from multiple sensing nodes.These nodes transmit information to a base station, where data consolidation occurs before secure transmission to a server via Wi-Fi.A key aspect of the framework is its emphasis on security (incorporating robust encryption, authentication) and access control strategies to mitigate risks, which associated with IoT deployments in agricultural system.Furthermore, the system's power management strategy is meticulously designed to enhancing energy efficiency and to extending the operational lifespan of the platform.This system combination (hardware and software elements) results in a reliable and secure IoT solution.Which it enabling real-time data acquisition, analysis, and decision-making processes for sustainable smart agriculture practices.This allencompassing strategy not only satisfies present agricultural demands, but also coincides with environmental aims.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207