ANALISIS KINERJA LINGKUNGAN PT. X TERHADAP PROGRAM PENILAIAN PERINGKAT KINERJA PERUSAHAAN (PROPER)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PT. X merupakan perusahaan agrobisnis di Indonesia yang bergerak dalam bidang industri pakan ternak yang dalam aktivitas produksinya menghasilkan berbagai macam limbah yang berpotensi berdampak terhadap kualitas lingkungan. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu melakukan analisis kinerja lingkungan berdasarkan Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan (PROPER). Metode penelitian yang diterapkan yaitu analisis deskriptif-kualitatif untuk menganalisis data mengenai pelaksanaan UKL-UPL dan penilaian PROPER di PT. X dengan fokus pada dokumen lingkungan, pengendalian pencemaran air, pengendalian pencemaran udara, dan pengelolaan Limbah B3. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah diperlukan pembaruan matriks UKL-UPL agar tolak ukur yang digunakan memenuhi peraturan perundang-undangan terbaru, terdapat aspek pengendalian pencemaran air dan pengendalian pencemaran udara yang belum memenuhi penilaian PROPER, dan mempertahankan konsistensi dalam pengelolaan Limbah B3, serta disarankan untuk melakukan kajian timbulan Limbah B3 guna mengantisipasi kapasitas TPS Limbah B3 dalam menampung limbah. Kata kunci: industri pakan ternak, kinerja lingkungan, program penilaian peringkat kinerja perusahaan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".