MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390147431 · doi:10.1177/2473011423s00113

Transfibular Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Clinical, Functional, and Radiographic Outcomes and Complications at a Minimum of Five Years Follow-up

2023· article· en· W4390147431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda N. Fletcher, Maggie Manchester, Jonathan Day, Emilie Williamson, Zijun Zhang, Lew C. Schon

Bibliographic record

VenueFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnkle replacementAnkleCoronal planeVisual analogue scaleRadiographySagittal planeOrthopedic surgeryRange of motionProsthesisPromSurgeryOsteoarthritisDeformityImplantArthroplastyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has surpassed arthrodesis as the gold standard for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. The Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle Implant (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN) differs from other newer- generation implants in the transfibular approach, non-mobile-bearing prosthesis, high-molecular-weight polyethylene, curved surface at every interface in the sagittal plane, and shallow resection depth. There is limited mid-term follow-up for this system. Therefore, we sought to report mid-term clinical, functional, and radiographic results we well as complications and survival for patients treated with the transfibular TAA at a minimum of 5-years follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent primary transfibular TAA by a single surgeon from October 2012 to January 2018. Inclusion criteria was a minimum of 5-years of follow-up with a completed consent for participation in the study and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). Patient demographics and perioperative data were collected. PROMS included: 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores; Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (OAS); and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Functional outcomes included range of motion (ROM) measured on weightbearing ROM radiographs. Radiographic outcomes included coronal and sagittal alignment. Adverse events and reoperations were reported using the Canadian Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) Reoperation Coding System (CROCS). Of the consecutive 151 TAAs, 83 (55.0%) ankles are included in this study, evaluated at a mean of 5.8 years clinical and 6.3 years radiographic follow-up. Results: The average age was 60.6 years-old. Preoperative tibiotalar coronal deformity included 27 valgus (10°, range 2-20°) and 25 varus ankles (-9°, range -2--25°), successfully corrected to neutral postoperatively. The postoperative PROMs were: SF-12 PCS: 40.4, SF-12 MCS: 56.0, VAS: 2.3, AOS Pain: 17.0, and AOS Disability: 24.9. Radiographic postoperative tibiopedal ROM was 17.8° dorsiflexion and 21.8° degrees plantarflexion. The overall reoperation rate was 38.6%(n=32) at an average of 28.7 months postoperative. Most common were removal of the fibula hardware (n=21,25.3%) and medial gutter debridement (n=15, 18.1%). There were 3 (3.6%) cases of acute postoperative infection (< 3 months) treated with operative irrigation and debridement but retention of the metal components. There were no cases of septic or aseptic loosening or subsidence. The overall implant survival, defined by retention of the metal components, was 100%. Conclusion: Transfibular TAA is a safe and effective treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis at 5-year mid-term follow-up. This study confirms excellent clinical results including PROMs and ROM as well as radiographic alignment correction and maintenance. The survival rate was 100% for retention of the trabecular metal components. The survival rate to reoperation was 60.7% with patients commonly requiring removal of the fibula hardware or medial gutter debridement. Patients should be counseled on the risk of reoperation preoperatively for postoperative expectation management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoot & Ankle OrthopaedicsSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207