MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390148736 · doi:10.23977/jeeem.2023.060510

Design of Real-time Monitoring and Alarm Device for Leakage Current of Portable Insulated Rod

2023· article· en· W4390148736 on OpenAlex
Xiaoyuan Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electrotechnology Electrical Engineering and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsALARMLeakage (economics)Electrical engineeringPower gridGridEngineeringReliability engineeringAutomotive engineeringCurrent (fluid)Power (physics)Electronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leakage current is an important index of insulation performance of electrical equipment. This paper introduces a portable insulation rod leakage current real-time monitoring and alarm device. Combined with the actual scenario of the insulation rod operation method, the insulation rod and current detection and alarm function are integrated. The device can effectively monitor the leakage current on the insulation rod body and give real-time alarm under abnormal circumstances, so as to ensure the safety of the power grid operation without power failure. Through the use of the device, the operator can improve the perception of the rod leakage current, take timely measures to avoid the occurrence of power grid accidents, increase the fault tolerance rate of field operations, and effectively improve the safety of the work site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it