MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390148919 · doi:10.23977/jeis.2023.080604

An intelligent plant growth monitoring system based on ESP32 and IoT resource explorer platform

2023· article· en· W4390148919 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pinze Li, Xinxian Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronics and Information Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile phoneComputer scienceMicrocontrollerProcess (computing)Cloud computingResource (disambiguation)Embedded systemInternet of ThingsReal-time computingTelecommunicationsComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant growth status monitoring is an important link in the process of plant cultivation. The traditional monitoring methods mainly rely on human labor. This paper focuses on the use of soil moisture sensors and light sensors to detect the plant growth status, and studies the way that can view the plant growth information in real time through the mobile phone program to achieve the purpose of intelligent detection. Considering the characteristics of convenient network transmission and large-capacity multi-channel, ESP32 is used as the main board for development, and a multi-sensor fusion perception device based on ESP32 is designed, which integrates the functions of data detection, storage, and transmission. At the same time, based on the Tencent Cloud IoT resource explorer platform, a set of programs for receiving sensor information is developed with a completed the panel design. Therefore, the purpose of data exchange between the microcontroller and Tencent Cloud is achieved, which makes it possible to display various plant growth status information on the mobile phone in real time, saving a lot of labor costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electronics and Information ScienceSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207