MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390148957 · doi:10.23977/jeis.2023.080603

Research on the Application of Computer Control Technology in Electronic Circuits

2023· article· en· W4390148957 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jiacheng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronics and Information Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI and Big Data Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceMicrocontrollerDebuggingScalabilityAutomationComputer technologyElectronicsEmbedded systemControl (management)Electronic circuitPower (physics)EngineeringComputer engineeringElectrical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article mainly studies the application of computer control technology in electronic circuits, analyzes the work efficiency of computer control technology from the actual situation, and attempts to find the entry points for upgrading computer control technology. This is of great significance for improving the performance and reliability of electronic circuits, achieving automation and intelligent control, improving work efficiency and product quality, and other aspects. Through research, it has been found that computer control technologies supported by different core technologies have different applicable ranges and functional advantages. For example, computer control technology based on microcontroller regulation has advantages such as high integration, small size, low power consumption, high reliability, and strong programmability. However, system design and debugging are difficult, computing power is limited, and scalability is limited. It is mainly suitable for industrial control, computer networks, and communication fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electronics and Information ScienceSame topicAI and Big Data ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207