MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient and Stable All-Lead Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells Enabled by All-Inorganic CsPbI2Br Top Cells

2023· article· en· W4390188875 on OpenAlexaff
Chongwen Li, Chuanxiao Xiao, Kamala Khanal Subedi, Bin Chen, Randy J. Ellingson, Yanfa Yan, Edward H. Sargent

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerovskite (structure)TandemLead (geology)Materials scienceNanotechnologyChemical engineeringGeologyEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fabricating all-perovskite tandem solar cells (APTSCs) is promising to overcome the thermodynamic limit of single-junction perovskite solar cells. Here, we demonstrate efficient and stable APTSCs based on Pb-based perovskites - a 1.91 eV cesium lead iodide bromide (CsPbI2Br) and a 1.51 eV formamidinium cesium lead triiodide (FA0.95Cs0.05PbI3). We introduce poly[3-(4-methylamine carboxybutyl)thiophene] (P3CT-N) to modify NiOx hole transport layer (HTL) for the wide-bandgap CsPbI2Br cells. The HTL surface modification enhances charge extraction and suppresses the formation of the detrimental interfacial layer, leading to high performance and stability of wide-bandgap CsPbI2Br solar cells. These advances allow us to demonstrate efficient and stable all-Pb APTSCs consisting of CsPbI2Br/FA0.95Cs0.05PbI3 subcells with power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) exceeding 22% and an operational lifetime of more than 1,000 hours under one sun illumination at ~65 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207