MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deeply subwavelength terahertz solid immersion microscopy using rutile optics

2023· article· en· W4390189188 on OpenAlexaff
Vladislav A. Zhelnov, Nikita V. Chernomyrdin, Gleb M. Katyba, Arsenii A. Gavdush, V. V. Bukin, S. V. Garnov, I. E. Spektor, В. Н. Курлов, Maksim Skorobogatiy, Kirill I. Zaytsev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceTerahertz radiationRefractive indexOpticsRutileImmersion (mathematics)MicroscopyMicroscopeWavelengthLens (geology)Optical microscopeOil immersionOptoelectronicsScanning electron microscopePhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rutile crystal is used to machine a solid immersion lens, boasting a very high refractive index of ~10 in the terahertz range. We further show experimentally that a solid immersion microscope using such a lens achieves a record-breaking spatial resolution of 0.06–0.11 wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNear-Field Optical MicroscopyFrench-language works237,207