MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Field Effect Passivation Enables 2.2 V Open-Circuit Voltage All-perovskite Tandems

2023· article· en· W4390189559 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Chen, Ted Sargent

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTandemPassivationPerovskite (structure)OptoelectronicsEnergy conversion efficiencyOpen-circuit voltageBand gapMaterials sciencePerovskite solar cellChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)VoltageLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyElectrical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All-perovskite tandem solar cells are promising to break the efficiency limits of single-junction cells at low cost. However, such promise has been limited by the open circuit voltage (VOC) deficit in tandems. The VOC loss is greater in wide bandgap (>1.7 eV) top cells than in ~1.5 eV perovskites. Quasi-Fermi level splitting (QFLS) measurements reveal VOC-limiting recombination at the electron transport layer (ETL) contact. Our study shows that treating the perovskite surface with 1,3-propane diammonium (PDA) increases QFLS by 90 mV. We found that the suppressed interfacial recombination is due to reduced minority carrier population at the perovskite/C60 interface, and improved surface homogeneity. PDA treated 1.78 eV perovskite cells achieve a certified 1.33 V VOC, and > 19% power conversion efficiency (PCE). Incorporating this layer into a monolithic all-perovskite tandem, we report a tandem VOC of 2.2 V and > 28% PCE. Encapsulated tandems retain more than 85% of their initial PCE after 500 hrs operation under 1 sun illumination in ambient conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207