Subjective language difficulties are associated with tau and objective verbal memory in older women with increased AD risk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Early cognitive changes in preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) include memory problems and language difficulties. Subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) are an AD risk factor and are associated with AD pathologies. Women have higher tau levels over men, despite demonstrating a life‐long “verbal memory advantage.” Therefore, SCC may be a stronger indicator of early tau accumulation than objective cognitive changes. Here, we examined the relationships among tau, subjective cognitive function, and objective cognitive function in older women at higher AD risk. Method 16 older women (age: 72.3±3.1years) participated in Women Inflammation and Tau Study (WITS). The inclusion criteria are: 65+ years old, AD polygenic hazard score >50th percentile, and a telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment score suggestive of mild cognitive impairment (MCI; range 16‐20). Tau was measured with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ptau181 and 18F‐MK6240 positron emission tomography (PET) with standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) calculated in Braak1, correlating with MCI stage. Objective memory and language performance were assessed with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT; immediate and delayed recall) and the Multilingual Naming Test (MINT), respectively. Subjective cognition was measured approximately one year later with the self‐reported Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog) memory and language subscales (higher score indicate more complaints). Spearman partial correlations analyzed the associations among tau, objective cognition, and subjective cognition while controlling for age. Result Greater CSF ptau181 was significantly associated with higher ECog‐Language (rho = 0.62, p = 0.02), higher ECog‐Memory (rho = 0.53, p = 0.51), and lower RAVLT immediate recall (rho = ‐0.54, p = 0.046; Figure 1). More tau in Braak1 was associated with lower RAVLT immediate recall (rho = ‐0.58, p = 0.03) and higher ECog‐Language (rho = 0.45, p = 0.09), but not ECog‐Memory (p = 0.26; Figure 2). Higher ECog‐Language was significantly associated with lower RAVLT immediate (rho = ‐0.59, p = 0.02) and delayed recall (rho = ‐0.69, p<0.01; Figure 3). MINT correct responses were not related to tau and ECog (p’s>0.28). Conclusion Our preliminary results suggest that, in older women with elevated AD risk, language concerns with memory features (e.g., word finding and forgetting object names) may track with early increases in CSF ptau181 and entorhinal cortex tau‐PET. Self‐reported language decline may be predictive of tau accumulation and worsening objective verbal memory, which could be clinically important for older women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".