MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390191952 · doi:10.1002/alz.082294

Caregiver Enablement Training to Support Homecare: A Study from India

2023· article· en· W4390191952 on OpenAlexaff
Ravina Tandon, N Navya, Jayashree Dasgupta

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaSession (web analytics)Family caregiversCaregiver burdenMedicinePsychologyNursingWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Homecare is the prevalent model of dementia care in India and ‘attendants,’ who are non‐trained lay workers are often employed in Indian households to assist with personal care, ADL and other support which the family may need. Providing training to these attendants can support continued dementia care at home. We present initial data from a caregiver enablement program (CEP) being provided in India. Methods The (CEP) consists of a minimum of 6‐8 individually tailored sessions beginning with a clinical evaluation. Using a collaborative approach, challenging areas of caregiving are identified and prioritized. Across the sessions, information about what may be contributing to these challenges and tips for providing care are provided by a dementia trained specialist. Attendants and family members are encouraged to use these approaches and feedback was discussed in an iterative manner to improve the caregiving process and address emerging issues. Results Ten families availed the caregiver enablement program, out of those 2 patients were living with their 24 hours attendant and 8 patients were living with family and attendants. The caregiver enablement program was conducted online, offline and in hybrid mode, 5 of them were online sessions, 4 offline sessions and one hybrid session (session conducted at home and online). Patients had moderate to severe stage dementia (Hindi MMSE Mn = 13.3, SD = 5.7; Caregiver burden: Zarit burden interview Mn = 29.8 SD = 19.6). Key areas where enablement was required were basic understanding of dementia, acceptance of the illness by the family and that they need external support, how to manage challenging behaviours like toileting, bathing, dressing, incontinence, transferring and feeding, how to engage the patient in meaningful activities and the need for environment modifications to improve safety and managing challenging behaviours. Psycho educational skill building, multi component intervention was found to be effective in the present study to combat the concerns shared by the attendants/family members. Conclusion This study demonstrates how up‐skilling lay workers through training on dementia and management of challenging behaviours can support home care. Supporting the informal care system with specialised training can be an effective way of providing dementia care in low resource settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues→French-language works237,207→