MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390192460 · doi:10.1002/alz.076469

Scalable Multi‐Sensor At Home Assessment of Sleep and Activity in Adults At High Risk for Dementia

2023· article· en· W4390192460 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Lim, Andrew Centen, Nasim Montazeri, Erin Gibson, Thien Thanh Dang‐Vu, Julie Carrier, Senny Chan, Sylvie Belleville, Haakon B. Nygaard, Manuel Montero‐Odasso, Howard Feldman, Howard Chertkow

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalBaycrest HospitalUniversité de MontréalCanadian Sleep & Circadian NetworkHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalConcordia UniversityWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActigraphyDementiaElectroencephalographyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSleep (system call)MedicinePsychological interventionPhysical therapyWearable computerAudiologyPsychologyPsychiatryInsomniaComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Sleep disruption is common in older adults, and emerging evidence suggests that differences in sleep whether measured by electroencephalography (EEG) or actigraphy, may be associated with clinical cognitive outcomes, and with specific dementia‐associated pathologies. However, whether EEG and actigraphic sleep features may predict cognitive response to lifestyle interventions for dementia, or whether they may themselves respond to these lifestyle interventions, is unknown. A major challenge is to develop sleep assessment in virtual studies where subjects do not attend a research center. Methods In the Canada‐wide Brain Health Support Program (BHSP), 350 adults at high risk for dementia have been recruited to receive an online lifestyle risk factors intervention. At baseline, and at 12‐month follow‐up, we are assessing 3 nights of sleep EEG and 10‐days of wrist accelerometry at home using a mailed‐out package. Wearable devices are mailed to subjects, who are instructed in their use, and data is collected remotely. The wearables are then mailed back to the study center. We used the MUSE‐S (Interaxon, Toronto, Canada), which is a multimodal wearable headband combining 4‐channel dry‐electrode EEG, with accelerometry and photoplethysmography, along with the AX3 wrist triaxial accelerometer (Axivity, Newcastle, UK). Results EEG headbands and wrist accelerometers were sent to 348 participants with a total of 1116 nights of EEG recording and obtained. Of the 348 participants, 15 withdrew from the EEG component of the study; of the remaining 333, 316 (95%) completed at least 1 night of recording, and 301 (90%) obtained at least 1 night of recording with signal quality meeting quality control criteria (adequate signal quality in at least 1 frontal and 1 temporal electrode for at least 80% of the recording). For the wrist acclerometry data, 342 completed at least 7 days of wear meeting QC criteria. Conclusion Fully remote sleep EEG and accelerometry data collection is feasible in a geographically dispersed cohort of older adults at high risk for dementia. The BHSP will provide an opportunity to assess whether EEG and accelerometric sleep features may predict the cognitive response to lifestyle interventions for dementia, or whether they themselves may respond to these lifestyle interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicSleep and related disorders→French-language works237,207→