Apprentissage de et par le territoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre de cet article, trois étudiantes-apprenantes-chercheuses allochtones partagent leur apprentissage de et par le territoire lors de leur premier semestre à la formation des enseignant·es à l’automne 2022. A l’aide d’une approche d’une méthodologie d’étude de soi ancrée dans une enquête transformatrice (Stanger et Tanaka, 2017), elles ont documenté leurs observations d’apprentissage tout au long d’un semestre pour ensuite en faire ressortir leur moments forts par la création d’artefacts dans un ePortfolio. Leurs observations étaient guidées par des questions, des lectures et des activités hebdomadaires basées sur des chercheur·ses allochtones et autochtones. Nous avançons que cette approche trans-systémique d’apprentissage (Battiste et Henderson, 2021) est une voie vers la réconciliation entre les personnes allochtones et autochtones, métisses et inuites ainsi qu’une réconciliation avec la terre (Madden, 2019).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".