MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390193132 · doi:10.1002/alz.075934

Effect of Virgin Coconut Oil on Cognition of Mild‐to‐moderate Alzheimer’s Disease Patients with APOE ε4 Allele

2023· article· en· W4390193132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoconut Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPlaceboApolipoprotein EInternal medicineCognitionMedicinePsychologyDiseaseDementiaPsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Virgin coconut oil (VCO) is an excellent source of medium chain fatty acids and thus, a potential natural ketogenic agent that can be used to substitute glucose in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain, in which the glucose metabolism is compromised. High content of polyphenols in VCO will also support to reduce inflammation and oxidative stress associated with AD. The aims of this double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial were to investigate the effect of VCO on cognition in mild‐to‐moderate AD patients and the association of apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype on the outcome. Method Study participants were 120 mild‐to‐moderate AD patients [Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) score = 15‐25, age ≥65 years], randomly allocated to either treatment or control groups and orally fed 30 mL/ day of VCO as the treatment and a same amount of canola oil as the placebo for 24 weeks. Cognition was assessed by MMSE, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), and executive clock drawing task (CLOX) at the baseline and at the end of the intervention. APOE genotyping was conducted at the baseline. Fasting lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels were analyzed at the baseline and at the end of the intervention. Result There was no significant difference in the post‐intervention changes of cognitive assessment scores, lipid profile and HbA1C levels between the treatment and control groups. The MMSE scores of the APOE ε4 carriers in the treatment group was improved compared to the non‐carriers (change of MMSE = 2.37, p = 0.021), whereas there was no difference in the control group. In both treatment and control groups, the lipid parameters were not compromised during the intervention. Conclusion Oral supplementation of 30 mL/day of VCO for 24 weeks did not improve cognition of mild‐to‐moderate AD patients compared to canola oil. However, VCO improved the MMSE scores of APOE ε4 carriers compared to non‐carriers. Consumption of VCO was safe as it did not compromise lipid parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it