MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390193412 · doi:10.1002/alz.077684

The impact of neuropsychiatric symptoms in in PSP. An overview of quality of life and functionality

2023· article· en· W4390193412 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alonso Morales‐Rivero, Abeer Khoja, Indira García‐Cordero, Blas Couto, Marta Lamartine S. Monteiro, Michelle Hei Lam Tsang, Jeffrey Antwi, Johnathan Sasitharan, Puja Bhakta, Batoul Alwazan, Gábor G. Kovács, Susan H. Fox, David F. Tang‐Wai, Anthony E. Lang, Maria Carmela Tartaglia

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain InstituteUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoParkinson's Clinic of Eastern Toronto & Movement Disorders CentreOccupational Cancer Research CentreToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentAnxietyQuality of life (healthcare)Epworth Sleepiness ScaleDepression (economics)Hamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleRating scaleCognitionPsychologyGeriatric Depression ScaleNeuropsychiatryClinical psychologyPsychiatryPhysical therapyMedicineCognitive impairmentDepressive symptomsPolysomnography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Progressive supranuclear paralysis (PSP) is an atypical parkinsonian disorder associated with oculomotor features, motor disturbances, postural instability along with cognitive problems and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Functional impairment and quality of life (QOL) are often related to the motor symptoms. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of neuropsychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance to functionality and QOL. Method We used data from 69 patients meeting criteria for probable PSP from the Rossy PSP Centre. Neuropsychiatric symptoms, severity and functionality were examined using validated rating scales including the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM‐A) for anxiety, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) for depression, Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) for sleep and Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI) total scores. To examine function, we used the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale (SEADL), severity of disease we used PSP rating scale and for QOL the (EQ‐5D‐5L). Cognition was examined using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). We investigated the relationships between neuropsychiatric symptoms and function and QOL using Pearson correlations controlling for multiple comparisons with false discovery test. Result In our sample (37.7% female, mean age 71.2+/‐ 6.5) 26.9% had depression, 13% had anxiety, 97.3% had scores compatible with cognitive impairment. Mean QOL‐EQ‐5D‐5L score was 50.4 +/‐ 25.3, mean PSP‐RS 39.5 +/‐ 12.7. Subgroups were made for QOL and functionality analysis. We found negative correlations between SEADL and HAM‐A (r ‐0.32 p = 0.01), and GDS (r ‐0.32 p = 0.01); between QOL‐EQ‐5D‐5L and GDS (r‐0.51 p = 0.014) and HAM‐A (r‐0.49 p = 0.014). Positive correlations were found between SEADL and QOL‐EQ‐5D‐5L (r = 0.61 p = 0.005) and between PSP‐RS and ESS (r 0.35 p = 0.004). The SEADL and PSP‐RS were negatively correlated (r‐0.39 p = 0.002). Conclusion Consistent with apriori hypotheses we found anxiety, depression and PSP‐RS are related to function as measured by the SEADL and quality of life of PSP patients. Sleep disturbance was related to PSP‐RS. These results emphasize the importance of comprehensive evaluations to better capture the multi‐faceted impairments seen in PSP that have a meaningful impact on the patient’s life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→