MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390194204 · doi:10.1002/alz.077499

Nucleus basalis of Meynert degeneration starts in the earliest stages of Alzheimer’s disease: A deformation‐based morphometry analysis

2023· article· en· W4390194204 on OpenAlexaff
Neda Shafiee, Mahsa Dadar, R. Nathan Spreng, D. Louis Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleus basalisBasal forebrainCholinergic neuronCholinergicNeuroscienceVoxelAlzheimer's diseaseVoxel-based morphometryPsychologyMedicinePathologyMagnetic resonance imagingWhite matterDiseaseRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background One of the earliest pathological events in the course of AD is thought to be the degeneration of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain (Grothe et al. 2012). The largest cluster of cholinergic cells within the basal forebrain are found in the Nucleus basalis of Meynert (NbM) (Hampel et al. 2020). Studies show that loss of cholinergic projections due to cholinergic degeneration in NbM, is associated with the decline in cognitive abilities, specifically in memory and attention processing (Mesulam et al. 2013). However, identifying the NbM region on MR images is difficult due to limitations in the resolution and contrast of T1w images. Method Data included the baseline MRI scans of 677 amyloid‐positive subjects from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset from ADNI1, 2, and GO. Scan resolution was increased to 0.5 mm isotropic voxel size by super‐sampling (Manjón et al. 2010) before non‐linear registration to an ADNI‐based unbiased template. The resulting deformation fields were used to compute the Jacobian determinant map for each subject as a proxy for local volume. A voxel‐wise linear regression model analysis was performed on Jacobian maps to assess the pattern of volumetric change within an NbM mask according to diagnosis: DBM ∼ 1+Dx+AGE+Dx:AGE+SEX; where DBM are the Jacobian values for subjects, Dx is the categorical variable for disease stage (NC, eMCI, lMCI, AD) and Dx:AGE is an interaction term between diagnosis and age of each subject. Result Figure 1 shows the statistically significant differences in local volume, comparing successive disease stages, within the NbM mask, after FDR correction (coronal section, A) NC vs eMCI, B) eMCI vs lMCI, C) lMCI vs AD). As it has been shown here, the Jacobian map (as a proxy for atrophy) becomes more pronounced as the disease advances. Conclusion Our results show that NbM degeneration starts as early as the preliminary stages of mild cognitive impairment, and this change accelerates as the disease progresses. This points to MRI‐based measurements of NbM as potential biomarkers for early AD detection and as a marker of disease burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→