MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390194627 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.130612

Effects of Insecurity, Terrorism and Political Instability on Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in Nigeria

2023· article· en· W4390194627 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cordelia Onyinyechi Omodero

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEconomic Growth and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical instabilityTerrorismForeign direct investmentPoliticsInvestment (military)InstabilityDevelopment economicsEconomicsBusinessPolitical scienceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the nexus between political unrest, insurgent activities, and their detrimental impact on Nigeria's economic prospects and the viability of human livelihoods.These factors have been identified as formidable impediments to foreign direct investment (FDI), posing substantial risks to international business engagements within the nation.Utilizing a dataset spanning from 1990 to 2022, the investigation employs a Vector Auto-regression (VAR) model to dissect the influence of insecurity and political volatility on FDI inflows in Nigeria.The findings elucidate a pronounced and adverse response of FDI to the prevailing terrorism, insurgency, and political instability.Moreover, the analysis reveals inflation as a concurrent challenge that jeopardizes international investment.In response to these findings, the study underscores the imperative of democratic consolidation and the implementation of robust strategies to counteract insurgency and terrorism.Additionally, it advocates for monetary policies aimed at inflation control through judicious regulation of the money supply, alongside stabilization of prices for goods and services critical to the industrial sector and household consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicEconomic Growth and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207