Enhancing Key Exchange Security: Leveraging RSA Protocol in Encryption Algorithm Based on Hyperchaotic System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This investigation delineates an innovative approach to fortify the secure key exchange process by integrating the robustness of the RSA algorithm with the unpredictability of a chaotic system, thereby advancing the security framework for color image encryption. Within this scheme, encryption keys are derived from a chaotic system, the initial conditions of which are dynamically modulated by the delta feature extracted from the source image. Such a design ensures that the system's behavior inherently adapts to the input image. The initial values and parameters governing the five-dimensional chaotic system are securely transmitted from sender to recipient via the RSA algorithm. Subsequently, diffusion and confusion processes are orchestrated through the application of two uniquely computed key matrices, which operate on the image at the column and row levels, respectively. This mechanism is instrumental in altering pixel values throughout the image. Performance evaluation of the proposed algorithm is quantified by several metrics: a high Number of Pixels Change Rate (NPCR) value of 99.621% illustrates its efficacy in pixel value modification, while a Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) value of 8.898 implies the retention of image quality post-encryption. Furthermore, an Unified Average Changing Intensity (UACI) value of 33.823% signifies the algorithm's proficiency in introducing substantial variations in pixel intensities. The results corroborate the algorithm's competency in encrypting color images, underpinning its utility in diverse applications that necessitate stringent data and image protection measures against unauthorized access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".