MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390195974 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.130616

Enhancing Key Exchange Security: Leveraging RSA Protocol in Encryption Algorithm Based on Hyperchaotic System

2023· article· en· W4390195974 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMustansiriyah University
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceKey exchangeKey (lock)Protocol (science)Computer securityComputer networkCryptographic protocolCryptographyAlgorithmPublic-key cryptographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This investigation delineates an innovative approach to fortify the secure key exchange process by integrating the robustness of the RSA algorithm with the unpredictability of a chaotic system, thereby advancing the security framework for color image encryption.Within this scheme, encryption keys are derived from a chaotic system, the initial conditions of which are dynamically modulated by the delta feature extracted from the source image.Such a design ensures that the system's behavior inherently adapts to the input image.The initial values and parameters governing the five-dimensional chaotic system are securely transmitted from sender to recipient via the RSA algorithm.Subsequently, diffusion and confusion processes are orchestrated through the application of two uniquely computed key matrices, which operate on the image at the column and row levels, respectively.This mechanism is instrumental in altering pixel values throughout the image.Performance evaluation of the proposed algorithm is quantified by several metrics: a high Number of Pixels Change Rate (NPCR) value of 99.621% illustrates its efficacy in pixel value modification, while a Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) value of 8.898 implies the retention of image quality post-encryption.Furthermore, an Unified Average Changing Intensity (UACI) value of 33.823% signifies the algorithm's proficiency in introducing substantial variations in pixel intensities.The results corroborate the algorithm's competency in encrypting color images, underpinning its utility in diverse applications that necessitate stringent data and image protection measures against unauthorized access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it