MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390196573 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.130618

A Robust Multi Descriptor Fusion with One-Class CNN for Detecting Anomalies in Video Surveillance

2023· article· en· W4390196573 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K Chidananda, Amit Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceClass (philosophy)Computer visionFusionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the domain of computer vision and machine learning, Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) has emerged as a pivotal area of inquiry, particularly relevant to security, surveillance, and video analytics.The extraction of pertinent features from video data constitutes a foundational aspect of VAD, enabling the discernment of anomalous patterns and structures.Features such as motion, texture, shape, and aesthetics are extracted and tailored according to the exigencies of the application and the intrinsic properties of the video content.The amalgamation of multiple features is often requisite for refining the accuracy of anomaly detection systems.Given the inherent high dimensionality of video data, dimensionality reduction techniques have been employed to mitigate computational demands and enhance the precision of the anomaly detection process.The present study delineates a novel approach centered on the deployment of a One-Class Convolutional Neural Network (CNN).This network is exclusively trained on normal events to establish a baseline representation of typicality.During the evaluation phase, the network is tasked with predicting the normality or abnormality of new video segments against this established norm.Moreover, this work introduces a novel fused feature descriptor, referred to as the Multiple Feature Descriptor (MFD), which is designed to encapsulate the spatiotemporal attributes of video data effectively.The proposed methodology has been subjected to rigorous testing against publicly available datasets, where it has demonstrated superior performance, outstripping numerous contemporary state-of-the-art methods in both accuracy and computational efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207