The Influence of Prior Head Injury on Late‐Life Cognition and White Matter Microstructure in Older Adults At‐Risk of Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The long‐term combined effects of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and APOE e4‐allele carrier status (APOE+/‐), a genetic risk factor of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), on cognition and white matter structural integrity in older adults at‐risk of AD is not fully understood. Method To investigate mTBI effects on late‐life neurobehavioural outcomes, a subsample of the PREVENT‐AD cohort was analyzed. Participants were cognitively normal adults over age 55 with a parental or multiple‐sibling history of AD. The mTBI group included individuals who self‐reported at least one prior mTBI with loss of consciousness and/or memory gap (n = 48, 33.3% APOE4+). Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test measured immediate and delayed memory, Color‐Word Interference Test measured cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, and Trail Making Test measured processing speed and attention. The control group included demographically‐matched (age, sex, years of education) participants from the same cohort without self‐reported mTBI (n = 62, 29.0% APOE4+). Data were analyzed using 2‐way ANOVAs with weighted means on years of education, corrected for multiple comparisons. To evaluate underlying structural differences in white matter tracts between mTBI and control groups, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics, including fractional anisotropy, axial and radial diffusivity, using the JHU‐atlas parcellation. Result mTBI/APOE4+ individuals performed significantly worse on cognitive outcomes of delayed recall, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control compared to controls; however, they performed significantly better on tests of processing speed and visual attention compared to mTBI/APOE4‐ individuals. DTI results showed that the mTBI group, compared to the control group, had significantly decreased axial diffusivity in the left internal capsule, right superior longitudinal fasciculus, and superior frontooccipital fasciculus (SFOF) (p<0.05 uncorrected). Within the mTBI group, significant positive correlation between lower processing speed and decreased axial diffusivity of SFOF, accounting for age and sex. Conclusion Our findings suggest that prior mTBI impacts cognitive aging in older adults at‐risk of AD differentially depend on APOE4 status, where APOE4+ individuals with prior mTBI had worse working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control but better processing speed outcomes. Lower cognitive outcomes in mTBI individuals may be supported by decreased diffusivity in specific white matter tracts. These results can inform dementia prevention in these individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".