MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390199487 · doi:10.1002/alz.076164

Novel EEG tools to predict early cognitive impairments in Parkinson’s disease

2023· article· en· W4390199487 on OpenAlexaff
Masha Burelo Segura, Jack Bray, Jean‐François Gagnon, Bettina Platt

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaAudiologyElectroencephalographyNon-rapid eye movement sleepCognitionPsychologyCognitive flexibilityParkinson's diseaseDiseaseMedicineNeurosciencePsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder mainly characterised by motor symptoms but often also associated with dementia, increasing in likelihood with duration of disease. Electroencephalography (EEG) can aid in the early diagnosis of those at risk of developing dementia. Therefore, we analysed EEG recordings across conscious states from PD patients with and without cognitive symptoms (Latreille et al in 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww018). Method Baseline data (REM sleep, NREM sleep, WAKE) from 38 PD patients (15 with and 23 without mild cognitive impairment) and 27 healthy subjects provided power spectra (qEEG), relative band power, as well as dominant frequency and its standard deviation to investigate markers for cognitive impairment. At follow‐up (an average 4.5 years after baseline), 11 patients developed dementia (PDD). Connectivity measures for left and right occipital and central electrodes were obtained as described in Crouch et al, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐018‐19707‐1. Result qEGG analyses confirmed previous reports of enhanced theta power during REM, NREM and WAKE for patients who developed PDD. A reduction in alpha power during WAKE was observed for MCI and PDD groups when compared to controls. Alpha rhythms generally decrease with age, alongside enhanced theta power, and this outcome may contribute to the global cognitive status of patients. A reduced and less variable dominant frequency was evident for MCI and PDD patients during WAKE, indicative of reduced flexibility of the network. Finally, rPDC detected disease‐specific changes, such as enhanced cross‐hemispheric connectivity in PDD in the alpha band during NREM sleep that indicate a lack of dynamism in the network. Also noted was the diminished interhemispheric communication in delta power between both central and occipital channels in PDD during WAKE. Conclusion Together, we here confirm that changes of theta and alpha power are optimal discriminatory biomarkers for PD with cognitive decline (with MCI and at risk of dementia). Also, spectral and rPDC analyses indicate that dementia in PD is preceded by a loss of dynamism in EEG activity during MCI stages, both at the electrode and network level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207