MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390199746 · doi:10.1002/alz.077578

Plasma biomarker and neuroimaging changes in a Chinese community aging cohort: The Greater‐Bay‐Area Healthy Aging Brain Study (GHABS)

2023· article· en· W4390199746 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tengfei Guo, Mingkai Zhang, Dai Shi, Yuxia Li, Xuhui Chen, Ruiyue Zhao, Guoyu Lan, Yue Cai, Pan Sun, Anqi Li, Yalin Zhu, Lin Liu, Lizhi Guo, Yajing Zhou, Zhen Liu, Kun Sun, Xinlu Wang, Linsen Xu, Qingyong Wang, Ying Han

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCognitive declineBiomarkerDementiaMontreal Cognitive AssessmentStandardized uptake valueOncologyCohortConfidence intervalAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNeurodegenerationHazard ratioAging brainDiseasePositron emission tomographyNuclear medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background To investigate the alternations of β‐amyloid (Aβ), tau, neurodegeneration, and cognition in different stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in the Chinese community aging population is important for early diagnosis and intervention of AD in China. Method We recruited 422 Greater‐Bay‐Area Healthy Aging Brain Study (GHABS) participants from the community and completed cognitive assessments, including 100 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 189 subjective cognitive decline (SCD), 82 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 51 AD dementia individuals. Among them, 343 individuals had plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, p‐Tau181, neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) data measured by the Simoa platform. Furthermore, 159 and 96 individuals had concurrent MRI and 18F‐D3‐FSP Aβ PET scans, respectively. Generalized linear models were used to compare plasma biomarkers, AD typical cortical FSP Aβ standard uptake value ratio (SUVR), residual hippocampal volume (rHCV), and cognitive scores between different clinical and A/T (A: plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, T: plasma p‐Tau181) groups, controlling for age and sex. Multiple comparison corrections were conducted (Benjamini‐Hochberg, p<0.05). The association of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 and p‐Tau181 with plasma NfL, GFAP, Aβ PET, rHCV, MoCa, and SCD‐Q were also investigated, including age, sex, and diagnosis as the covariates. Result SCD individuals had higher plasma p‐Tau181 (standardized β (βstd) = 0.251[95% confidence interval (ci): 0.031, 0.472], p = 0.038) and GFAP (βstd = 0.259[95% ci: 0.035, 0.483], p = 0.023) than the CU individuals (Figure 1). Compared to the A‐/T‐ group, A+/T+ individuals had more (p<0.001) abnormal changes in all the plasma biomarkers, Aβ PET, rHCV, and MoCa, and A‐/T+ individuals had more hippocampal atrophy (p = 0.012) and marginal higher plasma NfL (p = 0.074) (Figure 2). Continuously, lower plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 was only related to higher plasma GFAP (p<0.001), whereas plasma p‐Tau181showed significant association with plasma NfL (p<0.001), plasma GFAP (p = 0.026), Aβ PET (p = 0.028), and MoCA (p = 0.023) (Figure 3). Conclusion This study summarizes the characteristics of plasma biomarkers and brain imaging of AD and provides novel insights into the alternations of Aβ, tau, neurodegeneration, neuroinflammation, and cognition in different stages of AD in Southern China’s aging population. These findings are critical for using plasma biomarkers and neuroimaging to detect early AD changes in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→