MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390200864 · doi:10.1002/alz.082470

Cholinergic white matter hyperintensity volume, cognitive decline, and incident dementia in older adults

2023· article· en· W4390200864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heyang Lu, Yingzhe Wang, Yanfeng Jiang, Xingdong Chen, Mei Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperintensityDementiaCognitive declineCognitionWhite matterInternal medicinePsychologyCardiologyMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineAudiologyNeuroscienceRadiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are frequently observed in the elderly and their severity tends to increase with age. Previous studies have revealed that WMHs are closely related to cognitive dysfunction. However, as inter‐individual variations and a clinicoradiological discrepancy exist, not all individuals with severe WMH burden experience worse cognitive performance. Furthermore, the location of WMHs appears to be a critical factor in the relationship between WMHs and cognitive function. Few studies take both volume and location of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) into account to explore the association between WMH burden and cognitive impairment. We therefore investigated associations of cholinergic WMH volume (WMHV) with global cognitive function, cognitive decline, and incident dementia in older adults. Method A total of 752 older adults (mean age 60 years, 50% female) from the Taizhou Imaging Study were involved. Brain magnetic resonance imaging data at baseline and repeated measures of cognition over 5 years were collected and analyzed. WMHV in whole brain, the cholinergic pathways, and different tract classes in the Montreal Neurologic Institute standard space was obtained using the Lesion Segmentation Toolbox and tools from FMRIB Software Library. Multivariable linear regression, Cox regression, and partial correlation tests were performed. Result Over a median 5.67 (IQR: 2.88‐6.84) years of follow‐up, cholinergic WMHV was associated with annual decline of Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) (β = ‐0.206; P = 0.006), and incident dementia (HR = 3.45; 95%CI: 2.08‐5.74). Within the cholinergic pathways, WMHs in commissural fibers were related to incident dementia. However, greater global WMHV only slightly increased the risk of incident dementia (HR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1.01‐1.06). Neither global nor cholinergic WMHV was associated with MMSE in cross‐sectional analysis. Conclusion Cholinergic WMHV is associated with longitudinal cognitive decline and incident dementia in older adults. Within the cholinergic pathways, commissural fiber tracts were strategic locations correlated to incident dementia. Our findings suggest cholinergic WMHV might be a potential indicator of cognitive deterioration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalmedium
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→