Research on the Application of Color Psychology in Fashion Design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the continuous development of quality education and innovative education, psychology and art have organically achieved infiltration and integration. In this context, the article is based on color psychology and conducts in-depth exploration from the perspective of clothing art design. Using diverse methods and approaches, it systematically explores the main forms and value manifestations of color psychological expression. By flexibly applying colors, not only can the external manifestations of clothing be enriched, but also the diverse psychological and emotional needs of customers can be met. This to some extent enriches the knowledge framework of color psychology, and helps people have a more systematic and comprehensive understanding of clothing design, thinking about the value and function of clothing design from a new perspective. Based on this, the article first provides an overview of the development of color in both the East and the West, as well as the connotation and characteristics of color psychology. On this basis, it delves into the practical application of color psychology in clothing art design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it