Enseñar como lectoras: literaturas polifónicas para narrativas heterográficas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gender studies are an indisputable contribution to pedagogy and epistemology-oriented innovation. In this regard, the meaning conferred to the concept of innovation is gradually defined. To innovate is to retake, with a transforming will, the best of the legacy and to dismiss the outdated, it is to give and legitimize the voices of those silenced by history and give them the possibility to rewrite the forgotten; also to innovate demands to make visible and viralize reality, to validate pedagogical proposals that have as a driving force the struggle for dignities, that do not turn their backs on the climate and ecological crisis. In this regard, it is essential to analyze the link between Pedagogy and Literature, disciplines that converge in their political dimension from an ecocritical and gynocritical approach to the written legacy and new textualizations, capable of generating a polyphonic chorus that can transgress the limits imposed by a predominantly male canon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it