MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Trazos disruptivos: hacia una radical novedad

2023· article· en· W4390240616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClepsydra Revista de Estudios de Género y Teoría Feminista · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Issues and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial innovationPerspective (graphical)Action (physics)NarrativeMediationSociologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceEpistemologySocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this text is to critically analyze the question: what is social innovation from a gender perspective?, with emphasis, above all, on the purpose of innovation. The concrete answer to the question would be: it is the one that responds to the challenges and needs of citizens. Today’s questions must focus on the why, how, with whom and what of public innovation. Innovation represents an ecosystem of interactions and its mediation and purpose must be none other than the improvement and dignification of the lives of the groups to whom it is addressed. For this reason, the contrast of ideas and foundations is proposed as a methodological narrative that connects actors/actresses and diverse scenarios and invites action. The result? To insist that public innovation is either social or it is not; and it is linked to the gender perspective, or it is neither innovation, nor social, ... nor public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it