MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390267413 · doi:10.17691/stm2023.15.6.01

Identification of Diagnostic Schizophrenia Biomarkers Based on the Assessment of Immune and Systemic Inflammation Parameters Using Machine Learning Modeling

2023· article· en· W4390267413 on OpenAlexaff
И К Малашенкова, Sergey Krynskiy, Daniil Ogurtsov, Н. А. Хайлов, Polina Druzhinina, A.V. Bernstein, Alexey Artemov, Galina Mamedova, N. V. Zakharova, G. P. Kostyuk, Vadim Ushakov, Maxim Sharaev

Bibliographic record

VenueSovremennye tehnologii v medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)InflammationSystemic inflammationImmune systemMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMedicineComputer scienceComputational biologyImmunologyBiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

is to assess the possibility of using immunological parameters to objectify the diagnosis of schizophrenia applying machine learning models. Materials and Methods: We have analyzed 17 immunological parameters in 63 schizophrenia patients and 36 healthy volunteers. The parameters of humoral immunity, systemic level of the key cytokines of adaptive immunity, anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines, and other inflammatory markers were determined by enzyme immunoassay. Applied methods of machine learning covered the main group of approaches to supervised learning such as linear models (logistic regression), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), support vector machine (linear SVM, RBF SVM), k-nearest neighbors algorithm, Gaussian processes, naive Bayes classifier, decision trees, and ensemble models (AdaBoost, random forest, XGBoost). The importance of features for prediction from the best fold has been analyzed for the machine learning methods, which demonstrated the best quality. The most significant features were selected using 70% quantile threshold. Results: The AdaBoost ensemble model with ROC AUC of 0.71±0.15 and average accuracy (ACC) of 0.78±0.11 has demonstrated the best quality on a 10-fold cross validation test sample. Within the frameworks of the present investigation, the AdaBoost model has shown a good quality of classification between the patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers (ROC AUC over 0.70) at a high stability of the results (σ less than 0.2). The most important immunological parameters have been established for differentiation between the patients and healthy volunteers: the level of some systemic inflammatory markers, activation of humoral immunity, pro-inflammatory cytokines, immunoregulatory cytokines and proteins, Th1 and Th2 immunity cytokines. It was for the first time that the possibility of differentiating schizophrenia patients from healthy volunteers was shown with the accuracy of more than 70% with the help of machine learning using only immune parameters.The results of this investigation confirm a high importance of the immune system in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSovremennye tehnologii v medicineSame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207