Early Detection and Segmentation of Ovarian Tumor Using Convolutional Neural Network with Ultrasound Imaging
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The clinical differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian tumors represents a substantial challenge in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology, particularly following the detection of ovarian cysts through ultrasound.Ovarian cancers, diverse in type, often exhibit overlapping characteristics that complicate diagnosis.In this study, a deep learningbased methodology was developed to aid in the rapid and accurate differentiation of ovarian cancer types using ultrasound imaging.A deep learning approach, utilizing transfer learning with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models, was employed.To ensure the stability and robustness of the solution, ten iterations of training and validation were executed, with data randomly sampled for each iteration.The mean of the ten iterations' outcomes constituted the final evaluation metric.Initially, ultrasound images were enhanced to augment the quality of the training dataset, followed by the extraction of low-level texture features for the segmentation of images.Subsequently, ten established CNN models were utilized for both training and transfer learning processes.In the culmination of the study, a multitask model was proposed, capable of concurrently executing detection and segmentation tasks.The conducted evaluations reveal that the deep learning models can classify ovarian tumors with an accuracy of 98.79%, a rate comparable to that of skilled medical practitioners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it