CYL volume 60 Cover and Front matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada and around the world are invited to publish peer-reviewed articles in French or English that advance critical thinking in all areas of international law.The Canadian Yearbook of International Law also seeks to make Canadian practice in international law accessible to academics, policy-makers, and practitioners.Issued annually under the auspices of the Canadian Council on International Law, the Yearbook contains articles of lasting significance in the fields of public and private international law; a notes and comments section; a digest of Inter-American law; a digest of international economic law; a section on current Canadian practice in international law (including recent parliamentary declarations, Canadian treaty actions, and positions stated by Canada's Department of Global Affairs); a digest of important Canadian cases in the fields of public and private international law; and a book reviews section.Fondé en 1961, l'Annuaire canadien de droit international est une revue internationale réputée qui se spécialise dans les questions de droit international public et privé.Ses auteurs et auteures, en provenance du Canada et de partout dans le monde, sont invités à publier des articles en français comme en anglais, évalués par des pairs et qui mettent de l'avant une pensée critique dans tous les domaines du droit international.L'Annuaire canadien de droit international cherche aussi à rendre la pratique canadienne du droit international accessible aux universitaires, aux responsables de politiques publiques ainsi qu'aux praticiens et praticiennes.Publié annuellement sous les auspices du Conseil canadien de droit international, l'Annuaire comprend des articles de fond dans le domaine du droit international public et privé, une rubrique de notes et de commentaires, une chronique sur le droit interaméricain, une chronique de droit international économique, une rubrique sur la pratique canadienne en droit international (y compris les récentes déclarations au Parlement, les positions canadiennes sur les traités et les positions du ministère canadien des Affaires mondiales), un recueil de la jurisprudence canadienne relative au droit international public et privé, et une rubrique de recensions d'ouvrages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.936 | 0.909 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".