MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390281282 · doi:10.17826/cumj.1318195

Unveiling co-occurrence of bulimia, depression, and self-injury in adolescent girls

2023· article· en· W4390281282 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aslı Begüm CAN AYDIN, Nihal Serdengeçti

Bibliographic record

VenueÇukurova medical journal (Online)/Çukurova medical journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPsychiatryClinical psychologyBulimia nervosaSuicidal ideationEating disordersPoison controlSuicide preventionMedicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) is defined as self-inflicted behavior that causes bodily harm without suicidal intent. NSSI may be a precursor to other psychopathologies or co-occur as comorbidity. In this case series, we examined the development of Bulimia Nervosa (BN) in the follow-up of 5 young girls whose first presentation was NSSI and who were diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) at the psychiatric evaluation. As a result, we hypothesized that NSSI may be a precursor for the development of BN. Clinical interviews revealed that perceived family support by the adolescents were low and mothers had difficulty regulating emotions. We aimed to measure these variables by asking mother to fill out Toronto Alexithymia Scale and adolescents to fill out The Social Support Assessment Scale’s “support received from the family” part. Considering that adolescents can be timid at times and do not express such complaints unless asked, clinicians should be aware of this relationship and should keep the symptoms in mind during interviews in terms of preventive psychiatry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÇukurova medical journal (Online)/Çukurova medical journalSame topicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207