MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390281550 · doi:10.59403/2b9jk49

The Canadian Indirect Tax Landscape for Foreign Suppliers of Goods to Canadian Consumers (B2C)

2023· article· en· W4390281550 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P-A. Cyr, L. Moons

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational VAT Monitor · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicTaxation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoods and servicesBusinessConsumption (sociology)Value-added taxIndirect taxDigital economyValue (mathematics)Level playing fieldTax reformCommerceKey (lock)Digital goodsPublic economicsEconomicsMarket economyFinancePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rise of the digital economy has forced lawmakers to adapt their indirect tax framework to ensure that foreign and local businesses would operate on an even playing field and that goods and services would be taxed within their country of consumption. With that in mind, some features of indirect tax regimes had to be reconsidered, such as import VAT/GST exemptions on low-value goods, along with VAT/GST registration requirement for non-resident suppliers of goods and services to local consumers. In this article, the authors address the 2021 Canadian GST/HST digital economy reform, analyse how it compares with the OECD recommendations and provide some key insights for foreign suppliers of goods to Canadian consumers who try to navigate the current Canadian indirect tax landscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational VAT MonitorSame topicTaxation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207