MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390285297 · doi:10.29327/1298891.4-379

PERFIL DOS PROFISSIONAIS DA ATENÇÃO BÁSICA DE OIAPOQUE: UBS PLANALTO

2023· article· pt· W4390285297 on OpenAlexaff
Eduarda Lorena Maia Da Silva, L Ramos, K. Ramos, Luísa Antônia Campos Barros

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais do Congresso Brasileiro Interdisciplinar em Ciência e Tecnologia. · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience and Education Research
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

atravs da aplicao de um questionrio entregue aos participantes. Dos 38 profissionais, 27 profissionais responderam ao questionrio. Entre os profissionais, 20 eram do sexo feminino e sete do sexo masculino. Com relao a cor/raa, 20 trabalhadores se autodeclararam pardos, quatro brancos, dois pretos e um indgena. Sobre o estado civil, 17 trabalhadores disseram estar solteiros, quatro casados, dois amigados, dois separados e dois vivos. Em relao a escolaridade, 4% (1)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnais do Congresso Brasileiro Interdisciplinar em Ciência e Tecnologia.Same topicScience and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207