MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390296111 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2024.01.12.34

Climate and Existential Angst: One Emergency Physician’s Personal Story

2023· article· en· W4390296111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph Vipod

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingExistentialismHistoryPsychoanalysisPsychologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Climate ChangeFull AccessClimate and Existential Angst: One Emergency Physician’s Personal StoryJoseph Vipod, M.D.Joseph Vipod, M.D.Published Online:27 Dec 2023https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2024.01.12.34“Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It’s not.” —The Lorax by Dr. SeussIt’s been a very challenging [year], if you have any knowledge of the impending (present) climate crisis. News stories of unusually early and abnormally intense wildfires across the north of our country. Scientists pointing out the incredible heat growing in the North Atlantic ocean water. A recent Alberta election where neither party deigned to discuss the hard truths of climate science and its implications for our industry, agriculture, and health. Our premier, unable to make the connection between the grossly abnormal weather and our wildfires, instead blaming arsonist ghosts. And the undeniable sight, smell, and impacts of smoke pervading our streets and homes.It’s all a bit much. And I confess, I gave in to despair. I recently tweeted out “I am so sad about the world and where it is going. I tried so hard. It was never enough. Please forgive me, children, animals, plants, ecosystems. This is all so tragic.”The response was immediate. Some concerned: “Are you OK?” Some dismissive: “What a drama queen.” But mostly: “I feel exactly this.”It’s hard to deny now the impacts that our fossil fuel extractive economy is having on the natural world around us. Hard to deny that the degradation of our natural world is having impacts on our society. And to think of how this will worsen with time in the near and far future.The emotions we feel are not pathological. It is very normal to feel despair when presented with the reality that we face. It’s like 8 billion people, and most of the animals and plants have just been given a serious, maybe palliative, cancer diagnosis with the only possible cure being giving up on burning fossil fuels. And we’re just not ready to do that yet.What if part of our inability to deal with the underpinnings of the climate crisis has to do with our refusal to acknowledge the emotions of what we are feeling? In our society, we must pretend that all is well, don’t look at that scary stuff over there, let’s go for brunch. Don’t look up.I feel grief: for the beautiful and alive ecosystems we are losing.I feel guilt: the gas-guzzlers I’ve owned before I was more aware; the flights to here, there, and everywhere.I feel anxiety: for the threat that befalls us over which we as individuals have very little control.I feel terrified: for the very real prospect of my life, and/or my children’s lives, being curtailed by calamity.I feel jealous: of those who can ignore what is happening, continuing to live their lives as if nothing is at risk.I feel angry: because there are people and corporations and politicians behind the myriad of bad decisions that have led to this. And none has faced accountability. And many still are in positions of power.I feel love: for this planet, for humanity, for life. It is often when the things you care about are threatened that you understand exactly why you value them so much.I feel community: for the people who do care, who show what we can accomplish when we try to make the world a better place. And caring people are truly the bestest friends a guy could ask for.Some people have suggested my tweet was a surrender. But let me be clear: I will never give up. My kids, the insects, the oceans, this province deserve that I continue to advocate for a safer future until there is nothing left to fight for.Things are going to get worse. This is just a preview to the future, which will continue to warm as long as we continue to produce methane, CO2, and other warming gasses into the atmosphere. Every fraction of a degree of warming avoided is worth the efforts we make today. Which is why there is such desperation in the scientists’ voices.“Is there any hope?” is the question I hear most asked at climate events. My answer: “Nobody knows what the future holds. But unless we do what the science says, there will for sure be bad outcomes. Please help.”Getting involved creates active hope, for you and for me. ■This article is reprinted from the newsletter Gen Dread with permission from its author. Gen Dread is a newsletter about climate change.Joseph Vipod, M.D., is an emergency doctor in Calgary, the past president of the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, and co-founder of the Calgary Climate Hub. ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207