Single-cell transcriptional mapping reveals genetic and non-genetic determinants of aberrant differentiation in AML
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), genetic mutations distort hematopoietic differentiation, resulting in the accumulation of leukemic blasts. Yet, it remains unclear how these mutations intersect with cellular origins and whether they converge upon similar differentiation patterns. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has enabled high-resolution mapping of the relationship between leukemia and normal cell states, yet this application is hampered by imprecise reference maps of normal hematopoiesis and small sample sizes among patient cohorts. As a first step we constructed a reference atlas of human bone marrow hematopoiesis from 263,519 single-cell transcriptomes spanning 55 cellular states, that was benchmarked against independent datasets of immunophenotypically pure hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Using this reference atlas, we mapped over 1.2 million single-cell transcriptomes spanning 318 AML, mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL), and acute erythroid leukemia (AEL) samples. This large-scale analysis, together with systematic mapping of genotype-to-phenotype associations between driver mutations and differentiation landscapes, revealed convergence of diverse genetic alterations on twelve recurrent patterns of aberrant differentiation in AML. This included unconventional lymphoid and erythroid priming linked to RUNX1 and TP53 mutations, respectively. We also identified non-genetic determinants of AML differentiation such as two subgroups of KMT2A -rearranged AML that differ in the identity of their leukemic stem cells (LSCs), likely reflecting distinct cellular origins. Furthermore, distinct LSC-driven hierarchies can co-exist within individual patients, providing insights into AML evolution. Together, precise mapping of normal and malignant cell states provides a framework for advancing the study and disease classification of hematologic malignancies thereby informing therapy development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".