MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390298793 · doi:10.1101/2023.12.25.573327

Pharmacokinetics, Tissue Distribution, and Formulation Study of a Small-molecule Inhibitor of MKLP2, LG157

2023· preprint· en· W4390298793 on OpenAlexaff
Namrta Choudhry, Jinhua Li, Ting Zhang, Jiadai Chenyu, Xiaohu Zhou, Qiong Shi, Gang Lv, Dun Yang

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioavailabilityPharmacokineticsPulmonary surfactantOleic acidPharmacologyChemistrySolubilityDrugDrug deliveryDistribution (mathematics)In vivoSmall moleculeBiochemistryMedicineOrganic chemistryMathematicsBiologyBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LG157 is a recently identified small-molecule inhibitor of mitotic kinesin-like protein 2 (MKLP2), an overlooked oncology target. This study aims to explore the drug developability of LG157, by assessing its druglike properties, determining plasma drug exposure in various oral formulations, and exploring the self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS). Solubility of LG157 ranges from 175 to 228 μM across pH 1.0 to 13.0, with a LogD of 2.41 at pH 7.4. It showed a high protein binding rate of 92.58% in mouse plasma and 90.30% in human serum. The bioavailability radar plot aligns with experimental data (69-85%), indicating good bioavailability. In line with the computation prediction, preclinical formulation studies in mice reveal that all five formulations tested offer decent plasma LG157 exposure, with the highest level of LG157 exposure in the PEG300-based formulation. Subsequent tissue distribution studies in rats indicated that the compound is widely distributed with the highest concentration of LG157 in the liver and the lowest level in the brain. The optimal SEDDS formulation, SEDDS-F14, consists of 65% Oleic acid, 26.25% Tween 20, and 8.75% PEG400 as oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant, respectively. SEDDS optimization, based on the central composite design, has achieved the maximum loading of 188.7 mg/mL for LG157. These findings support the developability of LG157 and encourage continued exploration and refinement of formulations for improved therapeutic efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→