Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article expose les dilemmes conceptuels posés par l’évolution de l’industrie horlogère suisse des quinze dernières années vis-à-vis des modèles territoriaux d’innovation existants. L’argument mis en avant est que ces modèles permettent de comprendre comment les dynamiques territoriales sont à la base du changement économique mais pas comment la valeur économique de ce changement se construit territorialement. Sur la base de différentes théories socio-économiques des marchés et d’illustrations empiriques du cas de l’horlogerie suisse, l’article propose une approche relationnelle, institutionnelle et transactionnelle de la valeur. Le concept de « valuation » est introduit comme cadre d’interprétation des dynamiques territoriales d’innovation contemporaines. Ces dynamiques ne se résument pas à la capacité d’un système d’innovation local à produire différemment de la concurrence. Elles impliquent également la capacité de ce système à s’insérer dans des réseaux multi-locaux de co-production et de consommation. Classification JEL : O31, O32, O33, R11.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.886 | 0.888 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".