MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390313092 · doi:10.3917/adh.124.0187d

Constan?a VINTIL?-GHI?ULESCU, Liebesglut. Liebe und Sexualität in der rumänischen Gesellschaft 1750-1830 , Berlin, Frank&Timme, 2011, 200 p. (traduit du roumain par Larisa Schipel)

2013· article· de· W4390313092 on OpenAlexaff
Ulrike Krampl

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Démographie Historique · 2013
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European and Russian historical studies
Canadian institutionsFédération des Maisons D'Hébergement pour Femmes
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude s’inscrit dans le champ de recherches sur les sociétés littorales et portuaires des petits ports ruraux au xviiie siècle avec pour cible la micro-élite des navigants-armateurs que sont les maîtres de cabotage. L’objectif est d’étudier, dans l’espace du pôle caboteur qu’est le Golfe du Morbihan, en adoptant le dispositif méthodologique milieu, famille, génération, les dynasties et les fratries de maîtres-armateurs et leur stratégie de contrôle de l’armement des flottes de caboteurs, moteur de l’économie locale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Démographie HistoriqueSame topicCentral European and Russian historical studiesFrench-language works237,207