MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390324680 · doi:10.3917/dhs.048.0633a22

Joseph-Alexandre de Ségur , La Femme jalouse , édition présentée et commentée par Flora Amann et Benoît Melançon , Paris, Québec, Del Busso, 2015, 320 p.

2016· article· fr· W4390324680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gérard Laudin, Paul Pelckmans

Bibliographic record

VenueDix-huitième siècle · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’édition Besterman de la correspondance de Voltaire et son supplément de 1976 présentaient déjà une dizaine de lettres échangées par Voltaire et Charles Emmanuel de Crussol, duc d’Uzès, entre 1751 et 1760. La découverte d’un recueil manuscrit au Château d’Uzès, contenant leur correspondance sans doute complète, permet d’ajouter à ce corpus deux lettres de d’Uzès à Voltaire, ainsi qu’une « lettre à un évêque » écrite par d’Uzès en réaction à l’attentat de Damiens, transmise à Voltaire et que ce dernier fit circuler. Nous présentons ces trois lettres ici.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDix-huitième siècleSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207