MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Multi-Armed Bandit Game for Multi-Tenant RAN Slicing

2023· article· en· W4390328049 on OpenAlexaff
Zeina Awada, Melhem El Helou, Kinda Khawam, Samer Lahoud

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSlicingControl reconfigurationScheduling (production processes)Benchmark (surveying)Distributed computingComputer networkRadio access networkResource allocationBase stationMathematical optimizationEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network slicing is an auspicious technology in 5G networks that can handle different scenarios and use cases. Resource scheduling is essential for improving resource-multiplexing gain among slices while meeting specific service requirements for Radio Access Network (RAN) slicing. It needs to be reconfigured adaptively to reduce re-slicing frequency, maximize network resource utilization, and guarantee performance and isolation between multi-tenants under dynamic traffic load. However, the resource reconfiguration problem is intractable due to the high computational complexity caused by the numerous variables. Thus, this paper proposes an intelligent resource reconfiguration for multi-tenant RAN slicing. We explore a collaborative online learning framework consisting of multi-armed bandits (MAB) for tackling small-time-scale resource allocation and propose the Exp3 algorithm. Based on the historical traffic data, our approach assists the RAN in making online resource re-scheduling decisions. Extensive simulations validate our proposed Learning-Based approach’s effectiveness compared with other benchmark algorithms (e.g., Threshold-Based, Periodic slicing). In addition, we investigate the Exp3 algorithm under different parameter configurations. Numerical results show the convergence of our proposed model, improve operator satisfaction and resource utilization, and reduce the frequency of re-slicing by ensuring multi-service and multi-tenant isolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207