MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390331675 · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123224

Fate, behaviour and microbial response of diluted bitumen and conventional crude spills in a simulated warm freshwater environment

2023· article· en· W4390331675 on OpenAlexafffund
Qin Xin, Nayereh Saborimanesh, Christine Ridenour, Hena Farooqi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Pollution · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersEPCORGovernment of Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceOil spillAsphaltEnvironmental chemistryEcologyEnvironmental engineeringBiologyChemistryGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diluted bitumen (DB), one of the most transported unconventional crude oils in Canada's pipelines, raises public concerns due to its potential spillage into freshwater environments. This study aimed to compare the fate and behaviour of DB versus conventional crude (CC) in a simulated warm freshwater environment. An equivalent of 10 L of either DB or CC was spilled into 1200 L of North Saskatchewan River (NSR) water containing natural NSR sediment (2.4 kg) in a mesoscale spill tank and its fate and behaviour at air/water temperatures of 18 °C/24 °C were monitored for 56 days. Oil mass distribution analysis showed that 42.3 wt % of CC and 63.6 wt% of DB resided in the oil slicks at the end of 56-day tests, consisting mainly high molecular weight (HMW) compounds (i.e., resins and asphaltenes). The lost oil contained mainly low molecular weight (LMW) compounds (i.e., light saturates and some aromatics) into the atmosphere, water column, and sediment through collective weathering processes. Notably, weathered CC emulsified with water and remained floating until the end, while the weathered DB mat started to lose its buoyancy after 24 days under quiescent conditions and resurfaced once waves were applied. Analysis of the microbial communities of water pre- and post-spills revealed the replacement of indigenous microbial communities with hydrocarbon-degrading species. Exposure to CC reduced the microbial diversity by 12%, while exposure to DB increased the diversity by 10%. During the early stages of the spill (up to Day 21), most dominant species were positively correlated with the benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) content or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) content of the water column, while the dominant species at the later stages (Days 21-56) of the spill were negatively correlated with BTEX or PAH content and positively correlated with the total organic carbon (TOC) content in waters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental PollutionSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207