INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF A PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM IN A CASE WITH CONGENITAL CENTRAL HYPOVENTILATION SYNDROME AND CEREBRAL PALSY: A CASE REPORT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome is a rare genetic disorder that presents from birth and prevents automatic control of respiration. Our aim in this study was to examine the effectiveness of a 6-month physical therapy program applied to a patient with Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome and cerebral palsy. A 6-month-old patient who was diagnosed with Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome and subsequently developed Cerebral Palsy due to asphyxia was included in the study. The case was enrolled in a physical therapy program for 2 days a week for 6 months in the home environment where they lived. The case was evaluated before and after treatment. In our case, the Modified Ashworth Scale, the Alberta Infant Motor Scale, the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination, Test of Sensory Functions in Infants, and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consol ability scale were used. In our case, pre-treatment and post-treatment scores were as follows, respectively: Alberta Infant Motor Scale score 3-8, Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination score 6-17, Test of Sensory Functions in Infants score 2-9, and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consol ability scale score 8-3. In our case, there was a significant improvement in Modified Ashworth Scale scores before and after treatment. Additionally, at the conclusion of the study, it was noted that the heightened pain and sensitivity resulting from the patient's extended stay in the intensive care unit reduced with the treatment. We believe that the administered physiotherapy and rehabilitation program offered support to the patient in achieving neuro-motor and sensory integration, underscoring the essential role of physiotherapy in rare diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".