Two Medieval Occitan Toll Registers from Tarascon , éd. William D. Paden , Toronto, Toronto U.P., 2016 ; 1 vol., XIII–278 p. ( Medieval Academy Books , 115). ISBN : 978-1-4426-2934-9. Prix : USD 73
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une soixantaine de courriers et minutes, vestiges de l’activité professionnelle et personnelle d’un procureur municipal de Dijon ( xve siècle), ont échu aux archives de la ville. Une première série d’échanges, avec ses interlocuteurs du Parlement de Paris, a trait au suivi des affaires en cours et accompagne la circulation des pièces juridiques et le versement de gages, mais laisse aussi transparaître des développements intimes et la circulation de cadeaux. D’autres envois adressés à la mairie lors de ses déplacements à Paris ou à la cour permettent de saisir habitudes de travail et mobilisation de réseaux d’intermédiation. Un exil temporaire, lié à un épisode de peste, ainsi que sa relation à son fils ouvrent la porte de son hôtel et de la vie familiale. Les derniers moments du procureur vieilli sont eux aussi entourés de tractations épistolaires entre la ville et le pouvoir ducal, qui tente d’imposer un successeur de son choix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".