MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390338224 · doi:10.3917/sta.pr1.0010

10.3917/sta.pr1.0010

2000· article· en· W4390338224 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé : Les officiers de l’armée italienne ont connu des conditions de vie particulièrement difficiles dans les camps de prisonniers en Autriche-Hongrie et en Allemagne. Contrairement aux autres nations alliées, ils ont été délaissés par le Haut Commandement et le gouvernement italien qui les a qualifiés de lâches, surtout après la déroute de Caporetto en octobre 1917. Afin de supporter leurs conditions d’internement, ces officiers, contrairement aux soldats, ont pu bénéficier d’une pratique sportive, avec l’autorisation des autorités austro-hongroises et allemandes. Les journaux des camps impulsés par des officiers chrétiens ou socialistes présentent des comptes rendus réguliers des activités culturelles et sportives proposées afin de rompre l’ennui, l’oisiveté et la dépression, dans le cadre de la Casa del Prigioniero . Des équipes de football aux noms évocateurs, « Pro Patria », « Presti liberi », sont constituées dans chaque camp où les matchs sont suivis par un nombreux public. Les bénéfices de ces matchs, dont les entrées sont payantes, sont versés aux indigents du camp. Des compétitions d’athlétisme, des rencontres de boxe et de lutte ont également lieu ainsi que des matchs de tennis attestant d’une pratique sportive d’avant-guerre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9680.975

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207