MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390339936 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3743616/v1

Effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults: an overview of systematic reviews

2023· preprint· en· W4390339936 on OpenAlexafffund
Mona Hersi, Andrew Beck, Candyce Hamel, Leila Esmaeilisaraji, Kusala Pussegoda, Bradley Austin, Nadera Ahmadzai, Misty Pratt, Micere Thuku, Fatemeh Yazdi, Alexandria Bennett, Nicole Shaver, Niyati Vyas, Becky Skidmore, Brian Hutton, Douglas G. Manuel, Matt Morrow, Smita Pakhalé, Justin Presseau, Beverley Shea, Julian Little, David Moher, Adrienne Stevens

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
FundersGovernment of CanadaPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsPsychological interventionSystematic reviewPsychologyEnvironmental healthMedicineMEDLINEPolitical sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.098
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.098
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.021
Bibliometrics0.0140.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.447
GPT teacher head0.541
Teacher spread0.094 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicSmoking Behavior and Cessation→French-language works237,207→