MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390341354 · doi:10.16956/jes.2023.23.4.123

Supernumerary Mediastinal Parathyroid Carcinoma Resulting in Recurrent Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Hypercalcemic Crisis: A Case Report

2023· article· en· W4390341354 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle Irvine, Russell Murphy, Dimitrios Coutsinos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endocrine Surgery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary hyperparathyroidismParathyroid carcinomaSupernumeraryMedicineHyperparathyroidismCarcinomaParathyroid neoplasmParathyroid adenomaRadiologyInternal medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a common cause of hypercalcemia but is rarely caused by a parathyroid carcinoma.Supernumerary glands are also uncommon in the setting of recurrent disease.We present a case of an 87-year-old female who presented in a hypercalcemic crisis due to recurrent primary hyperparathyroidism.Imaging studies showed a large parathyroid adenoma in the superior mediastinum believed to be a supernumerary gland.She was taken for a joint operation with ear, nose and throat and thoracic surgery where she underwent a thoracoscopic resection of the gland.The lesion appeared to be locally invasive involving the mediastinal fat and azygous vein.Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels showed an appropriate drop and post-operative calcium levels normalised.Final pathology showed a 5 cm parathyroid adenoma which in the setting of her significantly elevated PTH and locally aggressive lesion would be consistent with a supernumerary parathyroid carcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endocrine Surgery→Same topicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→