MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390342643 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560619

Optimization of Power Quality in Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems

2023· article· en· W4390342643 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelhaq Dahmani, Kamal Himour, Yacine Guettaf

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemPower qualityGridQuality (philosophy)Grid-connected photovoltaic power systemComputer scienceRooftop photovoltaic power stationPower (physics)Electrical engineeringMaximum power point trackingEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study we propose the optimization of the power quality in photovoltaic systems connected to grid.This system is composed of a grid powered by a photovoltaic generator (PVG) through two static converters controlled independently.A boost converter is a power electronic circuit that steps up a DC voltage to a higher level while regulating the output voltage of the PVG.this converter is control by incremental conductance (IC) which is one of the best maximum power point tracker technics (MPPT) to extract maximum power of the PVG, by dynamically modifying the operating voltage based on the instantaneous slope of the power-voltage curve.For a best quality of voltage and current injected to grid we use the simplified pulse width modulation (PWM) to command different structures of three-level inverters: A three-phase three-level flying capacitor (FC), a three-phase three-level neutral point clamped (NPC) and an active neutral point clamped (ANPC) three-phase three-level inverter.The proposed system was simulated in MATLAB Simulink to demonstrate its effectiveness in improving the power quality when injecting power from a photovoltaic generator (PVG) into the grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207