MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390343197 · doi:10.29173/jjs110

Intimations of Maturity in Jane Austen's Youthful Writing

2023· article· en· W4390343197 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Juliet McMaster

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Juvenilia Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaturity (psychological)PsychologyPsychoanalysisArt historyLiteratureHistoryArtDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notwithstanding the striking differences between Jane Austen’s novels, with all their subtlety and nuance, and her rowdy and over-stated juvenilia, certain recurring elements of her fiction can be traced throughout: for instance, the recurring incident of the “bombshell signature” of the run-away couples, which appears in Henry & Eliza, Pride and Prejudice, and elsewhere. Characters in The Three Sisters and Lesley Castle show signs of the kind of developing moral consciousness typical of the novels. The author writes as the illustrator of many of the juvenilia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Juvenilia StudiesSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207