MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390343202 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560601

Using Genetic Algorithms for Optimal Electromagnetic Parameters of SPM Synchronous Motors

2023· article· fr· W4390343202 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Trinh Cong Truong, Thanh Nguyen Vu, Hung Bui Duc, Vương Đặng Quốc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrường Đại học Bách Khoa Hà Nội
KeywordsRotor (electric)MagnetFinite element methodExcitationGenetic algorithmPermanent magnet synchronous motorComputer scienceOptimal designAutomotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)Process (computing)Synchronous motorResponse surface methodologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) have been widely used in industrial applications due to the high efficiency, reliable performance and different shapes and sizes.Based on the arrangement of permanent magnets (PMs), the PMSM can be split into two primary types, i.e., surface-mounted permanent magnet (SPM) motors and interior permanent magnet (IPM).For the SPM motor, PMS are mounted on the rotor surface, while the IPM has the magnets embedded into the rotor.The use of PMs for the PMSMs has eliminated the necessity for excitation currents, thanks to the high flux density and significant coercive force.The resulting absence of excitation losses plays a key role in enhancing overall efficiency.This research, introduces a multi-objective optimal design strategy for a surface-mounted PMSM, with the primary goal of achieving maximum efficiency while minimizing material costs.The optimization is carried out through the application of a genetic algorithm.In addition, a finite element method is proposed to validate a comprehensive assessment and comparison of the variances between the initial design and optimal design.The proposed methods are applied to the practical problem of 5.5 kW SPMSM.The FEM and calculation results showed that the motor' s efficiency increased 0.5% and material cost decreased 15.2$ after the optimization process, both are the expected results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207