MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390344873 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560611

Efficient Geographic Routing for High-Speed Data in Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

2023· article· fr· W4390344873 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mamatha M. Pandith, Nataraj Kanathur Ramaswamy, S Mallikarjunaswamy, Rekha Kanathur Ramaswamy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVision Group on Science and TechnologyVisvesvaraya Technological University
KeywordsGeographic routingComputer scienceComputer networkRouting (electronic design automation)Wireless sensor networkDynamic Source RoutingMultimediaRouting protocol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent eras, a large amount of data has been transferred through wireless networks in fifth-generation communication using a two-phase geography greedy forwarding (TPGF) routing algorithm with reconfigurable routing metrics represented by RrTPGF in random duty-cycled wireless multilevel multimedia sensor networks (WMSNs).The proposed method reduces the sleep delay in geographic routing networks.the systematically forwarded node in the geographic routing network to identify the significant neighboring nodes.The proposed algorithm is efficient in identifying the geographical distance of the neighboring node and identifying the sleeping delay of the nodes during the communication process.The proposed algorithm efficiently differentiates the worked node from the unworked node on the basis that it identifies the optimal single routing path with a low sleeping delay time at geographic routing.As per the simulation result, the performance of the proposed method shows better results as compared to the conventional methods when considering the scenario size of 750mm × 450mm and 250 nodes with respect to the average delay of the proposed method, which is reduced to 0.6%, and the average hop counts, which are reduced to 0.56% as compared to the conventional method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207